I decided "C" over "EW" because variant "C" specifies precision adjustments where "EW" does not. Movement has 6 Adjustments
In reply to Good one, Will! Got a real by bobbee
....please quench it buddy! I do like the observation "EW" is the "A" on the next ad, and the "HW" becomes the "M" It was too blurry for me to see the price differences thought, and you pointed out the second ad is probably for solid gold versions, so EW doesn't become the A w/o gold content change. Thanks for clearing that one up too, as the mug may be frosty again very soon....
Jared
I am sure you must have a gold filled or plated expansion band in your collection of parts, just put it on and resolve the issue an we can call it the "C". 'K.
My vote is "EW" until you put on an expansion band old buddy. Very nice watch and kinda woke us up from the stupor we seem to have been in lately.
getting close - if I got it right.
(2) OT and DarHin "C" variant
(3) Fifth, Geoff, Bobbee generic His Excellency
(4) Will, Bourg01, Admin, and JP "EW" variant
Three members left to swing the vote: Rev Rob, VintageBulova, and Plains
Some folks may change their votes above if I got it wrong.
In reply to As we have conflicting by bobbee
In reply to Bobbee I thought the by William Smith
Not so Will. You misunderstood my reasoning, or misread the explanation. My meaning is the"C" and "HW" watches are solid gold, because of the words"natural gold" used in one ad to describe both cases, but in the other ad the HW becomes the M, and is described as "14K solid gold", but costs $135, the same price as the "natural gold" HW. By this reasoning I deduce the C, with "natural gold" case, would be made from solid gold, thus explaining the price difference between the C and the EW variants. But with the two ads having different numbers for the same watches, this is now redundant.