I guessed at the year based on movement model. Wondering about this case, did Bulova produce salesmans display watches, or is this possibly a marriage? Case diameter about 33mm, case back appears to be base metal or similar composition, with acrylic crystal. Movement has small 48 marking on winding rotor, and either BXW or 8XW on balance bridge. Only markings I can find.
Duo Wind. However, either this is an early prototype, possibly not intended for sale, or it has been modded. This is extremely common in the pocket watch world, where bezels are added as casebacks. It is possible that, being an early Duo-Wind, someone at Bulova had this made to pass around the boardroom to show their first bi-directional autowinding watch. I'm inclined to think it is more likely that someone modified it, however.
In reply to Regardless of the back...Duo by mybulova_admin
PM send to JustGary to confirm "48" on rotor. Fifth and Rev Rob have pointed out this bidirectional bulova movement is based on 415 Felsa, w/ the Bidynator technology- w/ Ranfft listing production of this Felsa as early as 1942. Apparently same technology also used in Bulova 10AU and 9AB (and maybe other bulova movements).
Our movement database indicates the earliest examples of 11AAC (10AU & 9AB) are from 1950. Ranfft doesn't list any of these three movements. Lisa's movement database indicates start date of 1950 for the 10AU and 9AB and 1955 for the 11ACC.
If "48" date code is confirmed on subject rotor, and the "clear back" is assumed to be original, maybe this is an early example "salesman sample" used by Bulova to show their pending rollout of the movement and it's technology....and their pending release of the Duo Wind in 1950.
The words "Duo Wind" are not seen on the subject watch dial. Most (if not all) of the other "duo wind" bulova of 1950 had these words on dial. Thayer was a little later, and the Duo Wind words were dropped after a couple years (I think we see selfwinding or maybe automatic- I dont remember). Perhaps in 1948, Bulova hadn't come up with the possible model name Duo Wind, so that's why we don't see it on the dial of subject watch?
Or this watch is a 1948 non-conforming- housing an 11AAC in what looks like a 1950 Duo Wind case.
Or the "48" symbol JustGary notes on the rotor is actually an LO.