Fully restored Trojan in very nice condition.
Added 12/11/2011
Photos Updated 11/13/2013
In reply to Didn't the Conqueror 10A have by stoddrob
Good question. I gotta look at examples of watches and the ads we have..... I don't remember offhand....and it wouldn't impact my ID of Conqueror for this example... I don't think we have anything saying it would be something else based on the jewel difference...if it's even in the ads or other comparable watch records.
Here's the 'before' pic Stephen - they are the hands that came with it.
Now - after having spent some quality time this morning with this watch, I have an apology. The case serial was misidentified - it IS 6518270 - my bad reading the partial '6' as an '8'. The open 9 on the dial got me to thinking it had to be a 1926, it is. Yes, it is 15J
SO - back to Trojan are we? I think so.....I have updated the dates, I cannot change the name.
In reply to If the case and movement by mybulova_admin