Anyone got a model on this?
In reply to Wayne, Yes. except I believe by FifthAvenueRes…
Wayne,
2 + 2 = 4 ....sometimes.
No - 'COMMANDER' was 30 Jewel automatic without a Date display.
I had assumed the 'PRESIDENT' must have replaced the 'DATE KING' prior to all of the information being disclosed in this matter.
'DATE KING' is a 17 Jewel automatic with a Date display.
'PRESIDENT' is a 30 Jewel automatic with a Date display.
Correctly ID'd as a 'PRESIDENT' the 'DATE KING' would be 17 Jewels.
http://www.mybulova.com/node/3592
3 from Me.
In reply to Correctly ID'd as a by FifthAvenueRes…
Bobbee, it's not a case of 'myth busted' or someone neccessarily being 'wrong'. We are all trying to do our best here with the adverts and evidence we have at the time of discussion.
A big part of the IDing process is that nothing is set in stone and new adverts that are found that look authentic and official certainly help us 'fine tune' and correct our previous IDs.
This is yet another good ID find and with the ad date corresponding to the subject watch I will put this watch back up for review by the panel.
In reply to Bobbee, it's not a case of by mybulova_admin
Said it before, if someone states something and purports it to be fact, as it is here, then it is a "myth", and they are "wrong".
The occasional "in my opinion" inserted at the end of a couple of posts does not alter the fact that in other posts, it is made to look like the statement is made from a factual basis with proof, yet has none.
Such statements are misleading, and lead to more confusion.
In reply to Said it before, if someone by bobbee