Bulova 1951 -Non-Conforming

Submitted by OldTicker on January 21, 2012 - 9:15pm
Manufacture Year
1951
Movement Model
6BC
Movement Date Code
49 (A9)
Movement Jewels
21
Case Serial No.
1396230
Case shape
Tonneau
Case color
Yellow
Case Manufacturer
Bulova
Crystal details
GS CC294-5 12.0 x 11.8mm
Gender
Ladies
Watch Description

1951 Bulova Academy Award Ladies 21J 6BC movement with a A9 date stamp, Gold Curtin Dial with Black numbers & markers and Black hands. The 10K Gold filled case and back is stamped L1, the band is a adjustable sliding clasp Bretton 12k Gold filled. 5X signed.

Discussion on this watch can be found here at  http://www.mybulova.com/node/3680

It is a very nice looking and good running ladies watch, and I hope one day we can determine which one of the 13+ letter codes this one is.

 

1951 Bulova Academy Award Ladies 21J 6BC
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
neetstuf-4-u
Posted March 25, 2022 - 4:56pm

In reply to by mybulova_admin

Well, it appears we can agree we don't know for sure what this watch is. My suggestion is to call it Unknown pending further investigation that may take years...

mybulova_admin
Posted March 26, 2022 - 5:36am

Based on how the watch is being presented and it 'not' having a stainless steel caseback, I can only assume it is yet another unknown variant of an Academy Award based on the components.

Kathy L.
Posted March 26, 2022 - 1:14pm

Yes, I also agree we can't know for sure what this is, unknown AA or Non-Conforming.  In my mind it is Non-Conforming based on the fact that I am pretty confident I have collected all the ladies AA models per the price guide BUT with our limited ads and lack of linebook or price guide for these years, you never know ; ) I am fine if you want to leave it as is.

JimDon5822
Posted March 28, 2022 - 7:40pm

I am for unknown.   I think there is a possibility this could be all original and think we should err on the side of unknown.

mybulova_admin
Posted April 7, 2022 - 1:30am

OK circling back to this one. After compiling the list of known models, I think it is fair to say (now agree with Kathy) that this case design wasn't used in the AA series (unless it's the mythical "JJ" variant).

Based on this I would classify as non-conforming as it is presented.

Geoff Baker
Posted April 7, 2022 - 9:23pm

Still agree with Kathy (and you Stephen!)