White gold version. Case back is hinged and has two serial numbers one outside, one inside. Inside case back is marked Bulova Quality. Not sure I've encountered a 10 AN without a serial number and a hand stamped only date code. Doubt the band is original but it certainly fits the era this watch was born of.
Added 12/28/2011 2/24/2013 Name Updated from "Trident" to "Lone Eagle" Photos Updated 5/31/2023
Adding outer case serial number: 282371


In reply to Thanks for the kind words, by bobbee
I don't know gents.... I found the same ads Bob has.. the 1933 November Ad out of Oakland. But for those two ads.... I found 10-15 other ads showing the Lone Eagle to be the one skinny one we have. Also several ads show the Trident above and the skinny Lone Eagle in the same ads. I'm more inclined (at this point) anyway to think those few ads might be some ad company getting confused rather than negate the other 10 ads from throughout the country for both 1932 and 1933.
I don't know either Jerin, but if this one:http://www.mybulova.com/watches/5285 -get's 2 ticks out of three from seven votes, with two ads using the same picture print, and an obvious geometrical difference, then why not the same for this watch?
Absolutely no difference, IMO.
EDIT:-
NO ENGRAVED TRIDENT ADS.
BIG, BIG PRICE DIFFENCE.
VERY UNUSUAL BAND, THE WORD "NOVEL" USED IN BOTH ADS FOR IT.
ZERO 1933 EXAMPLES OF ANY LONE EAGLES, AND ONLY ONE 1932 MODEL. (why)?
ONLY WHITE GOLD TRIDENT ADS.
WHY ARE THE ONLY ENGRAVED/WHITE AND YELLOW ADS FOR THIS WATCH BEING CALLED A LONE EAGLE?
COULD IT BE BECAUSE IT IS A LONE EAGLE?
In reply to I don't know either Jerin, by bobbee
In reply to Motion submitted to reopen by Geoff Baker