Bulova 1929 Daphne

Submitted by Dionisio79 on December 7, 2011 - 6:26pm
Manufacture Year
Movement Model
Movement Jewels
Movement Serial No.
Case Serial No.
Case shape
Case color
Watch Description

 Hi, I bought this recently, apparently 14k gold filled... any other information anyone could provide would be gratefully appreciated, thank you. 

Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Posted December 7, 2011 - 8:48pm

 Marvellous! (I must have misread the date on the inside.) Thanks for that!

Posted December 7, 2011 - 8:53pm

Bulova produced a lot of Women's watches using a case that was marked "June 10, 1924", that doesn't necessarily mean that was when it was made. That was when their "Patent" was approved.

William Smith
Posted March 22, 2012 - 7:46pm

IMO this record is too conflicting and lacking details to assign more than one star.  A two star 1924 Dianne w/o movement info, case SN suggesting 1929 (maybe case SN?).    Could it be the case of a Dianne?  Maybe.  I can't find a Dianne ad (1924 thru 1930) and link provided by admin doesn't work any longer.  Nice watch though...

Posted March 22, 2012 - 8:26pm

As discussed here, some of us don't believe the very blurry ad reads, "Dianne", rather we think it reads, "Daphne":  http://www.mybulova.com/watches/1929-daphne-3070?page=1

So, now this watch is listed in the database under both names.

Note:  The link I provided is the same post that Admin linked to above.  After the "Daphne" discussion, the watch name was changed by the owner, so Admin's link no longer works.

Posted November 17, 2012 - 11:08am

Dates to 1929 with case SN, as earlier noted by Daca.

William Smith
Posted November 18, 2012 - 4:59am

Yes case SN does suggest 1929.  I'll update in root record and note as such.  Also looks like the ad which was used for this model name was determined to be "Daphne" not Dianne.  See Daphne record and ad discussed at:

Clearer 1928 ad for Daphne (click for full ad):

Should I update model ID to Daphne based on above?

EDIT: 2012.11.19 Changed from Dianne to Daphne.


Posted November 18, 2012 - 5:04am


Good spot there, Will.