Bulova 1929 Ambassador

Submitted by FifthAvenueRes… on October 3, 2011 - 12:18am
Manufacture Year
1929
Movement Model
10AN
Movement Date Code
Shield
Movement Jewels
15
Movement Serial No.
630140
Case Serial No.
9529417
Case shape
Square
Case color
White
Case Manufacturer
Bulova
Gender
Mens
Watch Description

Case measures 33mm lug to lug x 26mm wide non inclusive of the Crown using Calipers.

White Dial shows raised Gilt Arabic numerals and Bulova Signature, tracks are printed Black. Hour and Minute Hands are Modern style and a Modern style seconds Hand appears on a sub Dial fully obscuring the 6.

A dustshield and retaining ring appears over the movement.

Caseback is stamped as shown.

*movement fully serviced by My Bulova Graduate Watchmaker Mr Richard Hostetler Jr 1/11/2012.

 

Bulova watch
1929 Bulova watch
1929 Bulova watch
1929 Bulova watch
1929 Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
mybulova_admin
Posted October 7, 2011 - 7:09pm

Plans to get the dial redone? I would be interested to see how it turns out.

FifthAvenueRes…
Posted October 7, 2011 - 7:34pm

Certainly warrants it admin, on down the road Yes.

Waaay tooooo many projects!

Daca102090
Posted October 7, 2011 - 7:54pm

Very interesting.. Way more engraving on the horizontal of the bezel that in the ad.

I'll bet this really catch the light.

FifthAvenueRes…
Posted October 17, 2011 - 4:48pm

I noticed that...not an 'AMBASSADOR' or a detail left off by the Artist ??

The engraving pattern matches at all other points and the Jewel count is the same.

 

* display ad updated showing matching Case horizontal details, ad dated 1930.

NOVA
Posted January 11, 2012 - 12:44pm

I'm not seeing a difference in the engraving between the watch and the ad.  Both have two rows of engraving with a plain stripe in the center.  Looks like a solid match to me. 

Now, for that matching bracelet. . . .

FifthAvenueRes…
Posted January 11, 2012 - 12:59pm

Dial first, bracelet may become an issue..

: )

The prior ad used only showed one row of engraving on the Bezel horizontals, dated 1928 or 1929 in the database.

NOVA
Posted January 11, 2012 - 1:04pm

No fair swapping out photos instead of adding new ones.  Makes it difficult to follow the discussion.

It may seem strange, but I actually read these things and try to figure out why people said what they said.

shooter144
Posted January 12, 2012 - 2:50am

That shouldnt seem strange, not if you actually want to know what your talking about lol...its all in the details !!!

JP
Posted August 15, 2012 - 8:32pm

Need cathederal hands?? I got'em for the 10AN Mark.

DarHin
Posted August 15, 2012 - 9:18pm

The only deviation from the ad that I see is the gilt hour markers vs radium.