Wonderfully restored 1931 Bulova 'Round the World'. Jan 11, 1927 Bulova Quality case unmarked for content found in lovely condition. Movement bears both Omega and Square Shield indicating a factory repurposed 1930 power plant. Period Speid-Fold bracelet makes it the complete package. (Speid-Fold? hmm, is it possible that was a precursor to Speidel?)
Added 1/25/2013 - Name update from Fleetwood to Round the World 2/7/2013 - Photos of presentation case added 12/11/2019 - Photos Updated 5/17/2023
In reply to Guys what am I missing here. by mybulova_admin
In reply to Stephen I think both the by William Smith
In reply to 'AMBASSADOR' Jewel count by FifthAvenueRes…
I disagree, the jewel count should not trump where the cases are uniquely different as is the case here. Movements can and are swapped, replaced. I'm not saying that is neccessarily the cast here, but a movement is not the trump card on a model ID.
If I put a 21J movement in a corner-cut Lone Eagle its still a Lone Eagle. If the are two identical case models where the movments gave then different names. I agree, but this is not the case here.The case is the determinig factor here and the only two-tone case we have evidence for is for the Fleetwood.
Yes it is possible that there is a third model that we are missing that is two-toned, 15J and has the double engraving, but adverts of this time were not always 100% acurate.
Tentative Fleetwood is my final call.
We have some period ads showing the 15 jewel Ambassador with two rows of engraving and no unengraved margin outside these double-rows of engraving.
AND we have a 1929 ad showing the Ambassador without these double-engraving rows, looking more like the Fleetwood (short of jewel count). This 1929 ad also shows an unengraved margin outside what looks like a single row of engravings. I think this is the Ambassador snippet Admin uses on the far left of his three comparison above?
So with ads showing both types of engravings, it may be a matter of year?
I'll line up the fleetwood adn ambassador ads by year.
Without addressing the two-tone issue:
I believe we are seeing one Fleetwood case (single engraving/unengraved margin) for all years for which we have fleetwood ads.
And we are seeing two different engraving patterns for the Ambassador in 1929: first that one similar to the fleetwood, then the engraving pattern seen in the two subject watches.
I'm thinking the fleetwood/ambassador cases are the same for part of 1929, and then the Ambassador (ads) indicate the pattern changed from that of the fleetwood to the unique double-engraved/no unengraved margin style from that 1929 transition date onward- which would include up to the date of the 1931 subject watches.
Doesn't address two-tone, but helps with the case patterns. Then we can discuss/assume the merits of an artist's rendering problem. I think there are three ads showing Ambassador w/ engraving of subject watch, so it would be a repeated "artists rendering" issue...which is unlikely IMO.
This one is fun.
In reply to I'm going to keep it simple - by Geoff Baker