Bulova 1967 Accutron Calendar

Submitted by M7bulova on November 4, 2013 - 7:40pm
Z
Manufacture Year
1967
Movement Model
218
Movement Jewels
15
Case Serial No.
D37671
Case shape
Round
Case color
Yellow
Case Manufacturer
Bulova
Gender
Mens
Watch Description

sorry for the few details I have included in my post. All I know is its M7(1967)  along with that it says "14KT. Gold Case" on the back with what I guess is a serial number? which is D37671. I have been searching for hours trying to find this exact model with no luck. If you have any information about this watch please do tell!!! :)

Bulova watch
M7bulova
Posted November 4, 2013 - 7:48pm

thanks for any and all help

 

OldTicker
Posted November 4, 2013 - 8:01pm

I think this is the Calendar "Z", I will check the ads and see if I can find it...

JP
Posted November 4, 2013 - 8:21pm

definitely a 218 accutron movement. I am inclined to agree with OT but will do some looking myself later.

JP

M7bulova
Posted November 4, 2013 - 8:29pm

Wow! Quick replies. I surely do appreciate it 

OldTicker
Posted November 4, 2013 - 8:33pm

The "Z" is shown on a strap, is the band that is on it now marked Accutron?

M7bulova
Posted November 4, 2013 - 9:25pm

Unfortunately I never had the original band. The band on the watch is just a cheap one I had at home after I had the watch fixed. But that picture looks identical!

OldTicker
Posted November 4, 2013 - 9:36pm

All you need is a nice Alligator strap and you have a nice Calendar "Z".

I don't think American Standard made the case, it should either be a Bulova  or Jonell.

mybulova_admin
Posted November 4, 2013 - 9:57pm

Should that be the Accutron Calendar "AD" as in the middle watch and thus the middle description?

mybulova_admin
Posted November 4, 2013 - 10:07pm

OT, I'm referring to the left most description relating to the top watch, the right description relating to the bottom watch and the center description relating to the middle watch. In my mind the "AD" description relates to the middle watch and not the bottom watch. Does that make sense?