1944 President G. in excellent condition.
Dial is undocumented on ads for this year (that I've seen). Wondering if this is a redial or original.
Looks to me to be a match to this one (your previous submission) ,with a different dial . I'm going to agree with
President , noting dial discrepancy until an ad proves otherwise. Question: in the side by side photo you just submitted in comments it appears that subject watch might be rose gold, or is that reflection? If case is indeed rose, the dial color would be appropriate.
In reply to Looks to me to be a match to… by neetstuf-4-u
Yes. Both of these submissions are solid 14k rose gold. The latter is in my possession now.
Dial colors are appropriate for both. Previous submission with slanted Arabic numerals is uncharacteristic for 1944. However, no ads prove otherwise nor other specimen(s) in database or on the web (for that matter) can prove dial is appropriate for either. Apparently, the 1944 President G (if that is what this is), is somewhat of an enigma.
This rose gold 1948 President appears to have the case and dial in the President G ad from 1946.
In reply to This rose gold 1948… by CodeGuy
Found one example of possible correct movement although this is still a mismatch in terms of manufactured year: 1941 movement with 1945 case:
https://empress.cc/products/1941-bulova-usa-president-14k-solid-gold-ge…
Thinking possible redial, as there us a notch at in the bottom on the dial under the sub-dial. These notches usually indicate some profession work to the dial has been done.
I actually think that Kathy might be onto something with the President "G". To me the case does look very similar and the solid gold case is correct, along with th 21J movement.
In reply to Thinking possible redial, as… by mybulova_admin
In reply to Thinking possible redial, as… by mybulova_admin
In reply to Thinking possible redial, as… by mybulova_admin
In reply to I believe the "G" is the… by Kathy L.