Bulova 1941 Lone Eagle

Submitted by OldTicker on December 26, 2010 - 5:31pm
Manufacture Year
1941
Movement Model
10AX
Movement Date Code
Asterisk
Movement Jewels
17
Movement Serial No.
-
Case Serial No.
1565918
Case shape
Tonneau
Crystal Details
23.2mm x 17.2mm
Additional Information

 1941 Bulova Unknown 17J 10AX movement, Clean 10K RGP Bezel and Stainless Back, Nice Off White Dial and Gold hands, B/R 12K Gold Filled Band. Very Nice Good Running Watch!

 4-16-11

This watch was previously ID'd as a Ambassador "A", but after acquiring a 1939 Ambassador and compairing the two, it belongs in the unknown catagory for now until another  Lone Eagle "A" ad shows up. ;-)

* Photo update 11-13-11

Case & crystal dimensions  41'  Unknown

Lug to Lug, 37.2mm

Length, 28.6

Between lugs, 8mm

Width without crown, 24.8

Crystal Groove, 23.8 X 17.8mm Curved both ways

Crystal, 23.7 X 17.7mm Curved both ways

False
1941 Bulova Lone Eagle A 17J 10AX
Bulova watch
Bulova watch
Bulova Watch
Bulova Watch
Bulova Watch
bobbee
Posted January 29, 2013 - 8:19pm

1939.

Geoff Baker
Posted January 30, 2013 - 7:23am

I am not ready to annoint this a LE, the lug it different, at least I think it is......

bobbee
Posted January 30, 2013 - 12:30pm

Every LE IV in the DB has these lugs....

bobbee
Posted April 27, 2013 - 12:28pm

Wonder why this is still unknown when we have ads for LE "A", which means there are more variants, just like the American Clipper and Minuteman had.
There have been IDs given on other watches with less info.
LE, variant unknown.

Reverend Rob
Posted April 27, 2013 - 2:42pm

My gut says LE. 

William Smith
Posted April 28, 2013 - 5:33pm

I'm good with 1941 Lone Eagle.   How did we get the A variant for this model?   Bobbee does the ad you mention- the A ad- match the subject watch?  I'm assuming your referring to an "A" variant and this does point to other variants probably out there.  I just see it's currently listed as an "A".

FifthAvenueRes…
Posted April 28, 2013 - 5:38pm

.......subject is not the 'A' variant.

William Smith
Posted April 28, 2013 - 5:52pm

In reply to by FifthAvenueRes…

you beat me to the punch on that point...I had to go look.  It would be better listed as 1941 Lone Eagle unknown variant IMO :)